S.L.M.D. v. A.V.D., 2017 BCSC 394

The judge described this as a high conflict case. The parties had two minor children, aged 18 and 16, and they disagreed about parenting arrangements for the children. The court summarized a “views of the Child” report prepared by a member of the Hear the Child roster. The outcome was consistent with what the children had said they wanted.

Read the full case (see specific discussion at para 42)