• Home
  • The Society
    • The Society
    • Membership – Join Here
  • Why Hear Children?
    • Why Hear Children?
    • Options to Hear Children
    • Interview FAQs
  • Roster
    • Roster
    • Roster FAQs
    • Roster Criteria
  • Supporters
  • Resources
    • Family Law Act
    • Resources
    • Related Cases
    • In The News
    • Roster Member Resources
  • Education
    • Education
    • Education Archive

Stav v Stav, 2012 BCCA 154

BC Court of Appeal finds trial judge failed to give appropriate consideration to child’s view. In Stav v Stav, 2012 BCCA 154, court relies on views of the child contained in Report prepared by Roster Member. See specific discussion at paragraphs 67 to 79 of the judgement.

Read the full case at www.courts.gov.bc.ca/jdb-txt/CA/12/01/2012BCCA0154.htm

Posted on March 29, 2017January 18, 2018Author admin_htcCategories Related Cases

Post navigation

Previous Previous post: Julie Donati
Next Next post: B.T.R. v. U.A., 2014 BCSC 1012


Copyright © 2025 BC Hear the Child Society
Site by kinlodesigns
All Rights Reserved
Terms of Use and Disclaimer